Talk:Sienna Shaw

Sienna Shaw has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 9, 2023. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sienna Shaw article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from Sienna Shaw appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 September 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Sienna Shaw of the slasher film Terrifier 2 was envisioned by Damien Leone as symbolizing an Old Testament angel?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sienna Shaw.

Wikipedia

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

GA Review[edit]

Passed. Vacant0 (talk) 15:07, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sienna Shaw/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 09:45, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll be reviewing this GAN as part of the ongoing GAN backlog drive.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Initial comments[edit]

It is possible that there is copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported 49.5% in similarity. ~~Will analyse this in depth later in the review.~~ False positive.
There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
The article is stable. There has not been any edit warring in the recent period.
No previous GA reviews.

General comments[edit]

Prose, spelling, and grammar checking.
- No problems were found in the lede.
- No problems were found in the rest of the article.
Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
- I've replaced curly quotes with straight ones.
- Add a short description.
- Add alt text to the infobox image.
- In the infobox, change the break tags (<br/>) to an unbulleted list using the {{unbulleted list|first item|second item}} template.
- The article complies with the rest of MOS:LEDE, MOS:LAYOUT, MOS:WTW, and MOS:WAF guidelines. There are no embedded lists within the article, so I am skipping MOS:EMBED.
Checking refs, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
- References section with a {{reflist}} template is present in the article.
- Fixed one referencing issue.
- Listed references are reliable, they are mostly news websites.
  - "Student" and her mother's name in the infobox is unsourced.
  - Ref 26 has author link to Steve Barton who died in 2001. I doubt that it's the same person, so that link should be removed.
- Spotchecked Ref 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 13, 14, 16, 19, 25–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
  - Ref 14 cites blisters but not cuts and bruises.
- Checking potential copyright violations.
  - False positive. The reason why it was picked up is the quotes in the article. I conclude that there is no copyright violations, and the quotes are properly used in the article.
Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
- The article addresses the main aspects and it stays focused on the topics.
Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
- The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
Checking whether the article is stable.
- As noted in the initial comments, there has not been any edit warring in the recent period.
Checking images.
- All looks good, images are properly licensed.

Final comments[edit]

@The Baudelaire Fortune: The article will be on hold for a week so that you can fix these issues that I've pointed out in the review. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talk) 17:04, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All issues have been addressed so I'll promote the article to GA status. Vacant0 (talk) 15:00, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 02:44, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Sienna Shaw of Terrifier 2 was envisioned by Damien Leone as symbolizing an Old Testament angel? Source: ^[1]
- Reviewed:

Improved to Good Article status by The Baudelaire Fortune (talk). Self-nominated at 03:31, 14 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Sienna Shaw; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Good to go Ergo Sum 14:29, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Jacobs, Eammon (2 February 2023). "'Terrifier' director Damien Leone teases 'Terrifier 3' and a potential 4th film, and says he's met with 'Evil Dead' director Sam Raimi about a new project". Insider. Retrieved 13 August 2023.

[1] Jacobs, Eammon (2 February 2023). "'Terrifier' director Damien Leone teases 'Terrifier 3' and a potential 4th film, and says he's met with 'Evil Dead' director Sam Raimi about a new project". Insider. Retrieved 13 August 2023.

[1]