Talk:Siege of Jülich (1621–1622)

Military history: Dutch / European / Spanish / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Dutch military history task force
	European military history task force
	Spanish military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Possible copyright violation[edit]

The first two paragraphs of the first section are a copy paste from Wilson book.Dove (talk) 14:40, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved as suggested. Sandstein 20:17, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Jülich → Siege of Jülich (1621–1622) – This siege was not the only siege of Jülich. There was the Siege of Jülich (1610). 86.97.186.109 (talk) 08:11, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This sounds OK, but if the redirect is to go to this article, I suppose we need a hat note, which is not there yet. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Pretty straightforward. I have added hatnotes to both articles. Skinsmoke (talk) 09:57, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with the move if others approve but there should not be a disambiguation page created (per WP:TWODABS). User:Skinsmoke's hatnotes work fine. — AjaxSmack 04:12, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.