Talk:Shipment (Call of Duty)
 | Shipment (Call of Duty) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 19, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Shipment (Call of Duty)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs) 20:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 12:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Will take this on in the coming days. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 12:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Six GA Criteria[edit]
1. Article is well-written.
2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.
3. Coverage is broad in depth and focus. Shows multiple aspects of the location.
4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.
5. Article appears stable. Does not appear to have had any major vandalism occur.
6. Article uses one fair use image with proper rationale.
Lead[edit]
-Looks good
Design[edit]
-Looks good
History[edit]
-Looks good
Reception[edit]
-The Game Rant source and Eurogamer source do not seem necessary to the article, as their points seem pretty trivial.
- Removed the point from Eurogamer, and tightened the writing from Game Rant since it still has some minor value.
Overall[edit]
-Reception's a bit weak but I'd say it's enough for the purposes of a Good Article. Looks pretty good. Let me know if you have any questions. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 18:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC)