Talk:Seth Warshavsky

Seth Warshavsky was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 16, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

His 15 minutes were up in 1999.

GA failed[edit]

As of [1], the article during this review, I speedy failed this article for Good Article. This article is still stub and unsourced. Please expand this article and provide it with reliable sources to support the three pillars of Wikipedia: neutral point of view, verifiable and contains no element of original research. Please read again what a good article is. If this article ready, then it can be renominated again. — Indon (reply) — 12:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a TLD[edit]

Sex.com is not a top level domain, it's a domain. I corrected this. .com is a top level domain. 76.170.99.185 (talk) 06:59, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]