Talk:Secret trust

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stub[edit]

Apologies for posting this article in "stubby" form. The redlinks were really starting to bother me, so I put something down. I will try and roll this out into something more substantive in the near future. Legis 11:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


ANachronism?[edit]

I disagree with the assertion that secret trusts are an anachronism. Just because the use of a device is rare doesn't mean that it is an anachronism.

Secret trusts can be useful indeed - publicity in many instances is unwanted. Further, the testator may wish to change their mind. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.24.162.62 (talk) 23:35, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]