Talk:Scottish Youth Parliament

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Coverage in the Media[edit]

This section seems to be sorely lacking actual media coverage - only 4 of the 12 citations are actually on media websites, with the rest being links to government websites or the SYP website. The section needs reformed or removed. Jackster (talk) 00:39, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it seems the referencing has just been done wrong. Still, someone telling a newspaper that an event has been a 'learning experience' isn't quite notable enough to be on a Wikipedia article, and a few of these stories seem to be nothing to do with the SYP at all, just about the antics of formers MSYPs.Jackster (talk) 00:44, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Having considered it further (I realise I'm talking to myself here btw), it seems the 'Coverage in the Media' section is little more than a trivia section in disguise and could probably mostly be redone and merged with the 'History' section.Jackster (talk) 01:45, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting The Coverage in Media Section[edit]

To be honest, this section is wildly out of date and until recently full of irrelevant articles. Reports on members going to protests is simply not worthy of mention unless you write about every single member who has gone to a protest. I would personally like to see this section entirely removed. A new page on the SYP website has been setup about media coverage, it would work much better to just link there rather than have that one section here which constantly falls out of date and is stuffed full of irrelevant items. Any one else agree ? S119234 (talk) 21:30, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:36, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Scottish Youth Parliament. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111002223609/http://www.scottishyouthparliament.org.uk/portalbase/pages/download.aspx?locationId=b7bbf130-b31b-4d5a-98e0-f90f0808314f to http://www.scottishyouthparliament.org.uk/portalbase/pages/download.aspx?locationId=b7bbf130-b31b-4d5a-98e0-f90f0808314f

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:56, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]