Talk:San Marino at the 2006 Winter Olympics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSan Marino at the 2006 Winter Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 13, 2018Good article nomineeListed
January 20, 2024Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:San Marino at the 2006 Winter Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nova Crystallis (talk · contribs) 17:31, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Reviewing soon. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 17:31, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • "single athlete,alpine skier, Marino Cardelli." Second comma is unnecessary, and the first comma needs space after it.
  • "Excepting the 1980 and 1998 Winter Olympics they have participated in every edition of the Winter Olympics since" Comma needed between "Olympics" and "they".
  • Maybe you should use the demonym instead of "they".
  • "As he was the lowest ranked competitor in the giant slalom he was last in the starting order on 20 February." Comma needed between "slalom" and "he".
  • ".[8]," Remove the period before the reference.

Not too much, mostly small errors. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 18:38, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks, Nova Crystallis, I've found most of these "small errors" are the type you can look at your own writing until blue in the face, and never see! Courcelles (talk) 19:14, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment[edit]

San Marino at the 2006 Winter Olympics[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: No consensus to delist, although it's very short. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 14:22, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Short for a GA. failing a criterion I think? GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 08:20, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No criterion failed, nominator has been requested to think before opening four reassessments with the same invalid reasoning. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.