Talk:Sam Glucksberg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

looks like an important and counter-intuitive finding, would be great to add some about this controversy of incentives, i.e. with rewards (or punishment?) it takes more time for people to solve the candle problem; quote from a TED-talk by Dan Pink: I want to tell you about an experiment using the candle problem, done by a scientist named Sam Glucksberg, who is now at Princeton University, US, This shows the power of incentives. He gathered his participants and said: "I'm going to time you, how quickly you can solve this problem." To one group he said, "I'm going to time you to establish norms, averages for how long it typically takes someone to solve this sort of problem." To the second group he offered rewards. He said, "If you're in the top 25% of the fastest times, you get five dollars. If you're the fastest of everyone we're testing here today, you get 20 dollars." Now this is several years ago, adjusted for inflation, it's a decent sum of money for a few minutes of work. It's a nice motivator. Question: How much faster did this group solve the problem? Answer: It took them, on average, three and a half minutes longer. 3.5 min longer. This makes no sense, right? I mean, I'm an American. I believe in free markets. That's not how it's supposed to work, right? end quote 109.252.23.93 (talk) 07:52, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]