Talk:Sacred groves of India

Stray text[edit]

This was found stuck in after the references. Not clear whether or how it should be integrated, seems to be a different topic, opinion or original research?:

Sacred Groves are the institutions of belief and are present outside the tribal villages as the symbol of the foundation of the village. Since the foundation of the village the Santhal and Paharia communities of Santhal Pargana division worship the foundation god 'BONGA'. These are being protected by the community. Almost all the Santhal and Paharia villages under the 6 districts of Santhal Pargana is characterized by the presence of a sacred grove. in this way it is true that only in Santhal Pargana there are definitely more than 21 sacred groves as reported in the article. At present it may not be in its ancient form but the age old Sal (Shorea robusta) trees are present in these groves. The Santhal community used to worship their god prest in these sacred groves - locally called as 'Jaherthan' before ploughing their fields and after the successful harvesting of the crop. These Sacred Groves serves as the community protected natural biological reserves which are very rich in biodiversity status. Saurabh Gunjan, DIA, Godda Jharkhand, India

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Sacred groves of India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:48, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://srpbypst.blogspot.com/2012/11/cultural-and-ecological-dimensions-of.html http://old.cseindia.org/dte-supplement/forest20031231/febrile_frenetic.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 10:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://srpbypst.blogspot.com/2012/11/cultural-and-ecological-dimensions-of.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 10:16, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]