Talk:Rowland Lee (bishop)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Rowland Lee (bishop) is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shropshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shropshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Shropshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShropshireWikipedia:WikiProject ShropshireTemplate:WikiProject ShropshireShropshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 7 October 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was proposed in this section that Rowland Lee be renamed and moved to Rowland Lee (bishop).

result:
Moved. Consensus there is no primary topic and base name should be the disambiguation page. (closed by non-admin page mover) -2pou (talk) 09:08, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Links: current log • target log • direct move

This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}}

– No indication of a consensus that this entry, marked as a stub, delineating the "hanging bishop" from 500 years ago (who is referenced throughout the article as "Leigh"), depicts a historical figure of such prominence that he becomes the unquestioned WP:PRIMARYTOPIC over Rowland Lee (composer), director Rowland V. Lee (also known as simply Rowland Lee) as well as similarly-named swimmer Roland Lee, Rowland Leigh (MP) and screenwriter Rowland Leigh. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 06:22, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support clearly not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC blindlynx (talk) 09:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The nom's rationale is wrong - primarytopic has nothing to with being "a historical figure of such prominence that he becomes the unquestioned WP:PRIMARYTOPIC". Instead, using the actual criteria of usage and significance, we see that this topic gets well less than half of pageviews, so does not qualify. No evidence has been presented about long-term significance. Dohn joe (talk) 18:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Dohn joe. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:25, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Absent the instant recognition of such multi-name primary topics as John Kennedy, Winston Churchill or Elizabeth Taylor and lacking discussions establishing consensus, most primary topics are either grandfathered as the first entry created under that name or chosen as a result of personal opinion. Although recent extended argumentations at Talk:David Jack#Requested move 6 July 2020 or Talk:John Nutt#Requested move 5 August 2020 ultimately failed to dislodge these marginal-primacy individuals from their positions, they also demonstrated that a number of longtime Wikipedians feel that being a historical figure of sufficient prominence does play a role in establishing consensus for primacy. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 16:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.