Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Senj-Modruš

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kingdom of Croatia , while it was in personal union with Kingdom of Hungary???[edit]

See [1]. No clue about any 'personal union'.

See: Lands of the Crown of St. Stephen . The Kingdom of Croatia, which survived in varying forms and sizes, was a part of the lands of the crown of St. Stephen, and by extension in personal union with Hungary. It was never a part of Hungary, although its sovereign was the Hungarian king for a great deal of its history. In this personal union, the Croatian Kingdom was represented by a ban and Croatian Parliaments were still convened.
Even after falling under Habsburg control, the Kingdom survived as an independent crownland with its Emperors styling themselves kings of Croatia. --Thewanderer 22:44, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fake stories written by Croatian editors. What are the historic documents of that time confirming this claim about 'personal union'? Why Hungarians have no clue about the same 'personal union'?