Talk:Robert Clivillés

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removal of properly sourced content[edit]

Hello 72.214.49.119, please discuss changes you'd like to make to this article here. I'm concerned that you're removing properly cited material from the page, and adding material that is from potentially unreliable sources. I'm also concerned that you've stated you are Robert Clivillés, and as such, I strongly recommend you avoid editing any articles about you. Again, please discuss changes you'd like to make here first. Do not attempt to keep making changes that are being contested. Thank you for your time. Chrisw80 (talk) 04:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Chrisw80: I don't think this editor is going to be one with cooperating with consensus. Judging by their edit summaries, they feel that because they own the company, they own the article, and can edit it to their hearts content. I (as well as other editors) have already tried to explain this to this editor. Based on ther uncivil comments as well, I wouldn't hold my breathe, either. Boomer VialHolla 04:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I suspect you may be correct, Boomer Vial, but we have to WP:AGF and try to work with them. However, given the number of reverts across several articles, plus the obvious rude language and page ownership stance, I've reported them here: AN/Edit Warring. Chrisw80 (talk) 04:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Chrisw80: This editor is clearly NOTHERE. There is no need to AGF. It's already been explained multiple times to this editor that Wikipedia is founded on consensus. Seeing as they are still continually removing sourced information, and leaving edit summaries such as "That's great that you feel it proper, but I don't want anything negative on my page that bears my name... So why don't you please respect that.."[1], I think assuming good faith is out of the question. Also, I've already reported them to AIV[2], so there is really no need for a report in WP:AN3. Boomer VialHolla 05:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That does seem apparent, but we had to try. Chrisw80 (talk) 05:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Trust me, I did. He's not getting it. Boomer VialHolla 05:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Robert Clivillés. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:58, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]