Talk:Resource-based view/Archives/2021

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Expansion and update

I cannot agree that this article should be rolled back or "let go." The RBV concept is already included in other encyclopedias such as the Encyclopedia of Human Resource Management (see:https://www.elgaronline.com/view/nlm-book/9781783475452/C298.xml); the World Heritage Encyclopedia, ; the Wiley Encyclopedia of Management; Encyclopedia of Management Theory; Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (where it is included as part of the entry on "knowledge management") and increasingly appears in business dictionaries, reference works and the like. If anyone is in any doubt about the importance of this concept, please do an Advanced Google search" and use the search terms, Resource-based view" in one line and Encyclopedia in other line of the search tool bar - you will soon find literally thousands of entries in reputable encyclopedias. If the article also serves as a handy resource for college students, then that is a bonus. RBV is an important concept in management and marketing, and as such should be retained in Wikipedia.

This article is in the process of being updated and expanded. I have included a host of high quality references, modified existing content where necessary and added new content to reflect current thinking. There are some concerns about copyvios in some of the content that has been added previously. I am doing my best to clean this up, adding reliable references as I work through it. BronHiggs (talk) 00:58, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Much respect for the work you're doing here, but note that the World Heritage Encyclopedia is a mirror of Wikipedia. They're not the most compliant mirror - the attribution is often obscured depending on which one of their 100 or so sites you hit. Kuru (talk) 16:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC)