Talk:Recognition of same-sex unions in Tasmania

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MOVE OF ARTICLE TO NEW TITLE[edit]

New article title to be LGBT rights in Tasmania. Makes it far more user-friendly and consistent with title for other States. Part of my streamlining of LGBT-politics articles for Australia. - Jono52785 (talk) 21:05; 7 November 2013 (AEDT)

1997 to 2007[edit]

Tamania is the BEST on GLBT issues - Yet the most heterosexist state in Australia?

Timeline Tasmania:

  • 1997 - repealed sections 123 and 124 from the criminal code.
  • 1999 - outlawed discrimination on sexual orientation
  • 2004 - significant relationships Act.
  • 2009 - IVF parentage reforms. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.148.207.230 (talk) 04:23, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the BEST or what!!!??? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.168.61.189 (talk) 07:02, 3 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Domestic partnerships?[edit]

The term domestic partnership is mostly used in the US. Is Tasmania's model actually called a domestic partnership? Is the title of the article accurate, or should it be called 'Registered relationships in Tasmania', or 'Recognition of gay unions in Tasmania'? I can't quite figure out what any of the Australian same-sex relationships are called exactly aside from the ACT's Civil Partnership! Ikzing (talk) 04:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The very first sentence of this article specifically says what those relationships are called in Tasmania. But I agree that the terminology, which varies from state to state, and country to country, is confusing. See civil union and domestic partnership. Textorus (talk) 07:53, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Recognition of same-sex unions in Tasmania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]