Talk:RealD

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

No go on Logo[edit]

The logo had the self promotional phrase, "the new 3D".
Assuming your a good faith editor, and it seems you are, I was wondering if you think that it would be a copyright infringement to create a new version of the logo without their slogan "The new 3D". I would be happy to do it.

Regarding the new section. You just copied a paragraph from the RealD cinema page. People going to the link would end up reading the same long paragraph again. I moved the relevant information to the lede, which is...RealD uses "circularly polarized light". While I checked your user page and thus don't suspect self promotion please read this.Talk:RealD_Cinema#The_reason_your_edit_was_reverted and try to understand my position. The paragraph has a self promotional feel to it as it is.
Again I just can't see what your new section added, unnecessary repetition is not a good thing. Dave3457 (talk) 22:44, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]