Talk:Rambani dialect

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India: Jammu and Kashmir Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir.

Claims of 4 sources[edit]

@Uanfala: In relation to your edit summary, can you please advise where these 4 sources are? Thanks.RuudVanClerk (talk) 21:55, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kaul, Grierson and Bailey (mentioned only in the text) and and the entry in Glottolog (in the infobox). I don't believe I've seen anything else published about this language variety. If you genuinely believe more sources should be added, then you're welcome to suggest them here. – Uanfala (talk) 22:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kaul and the Glottolog entry, sure. That’s two. The sources mentioned in the Kaul text are iffy and these generally aren’t classified as separate sources themselves. You can add the original works as references if you feel this is appropriate. Thanks. RuudVanClerk (talk) 22:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, they're not iffy: Grierson and Bailey are the two main sources, each with a solid description of the grammar. It's actually Kaul that's less relevant, because he only repeats the information present there and where he does add something new (say, his conclusion about the variety now being endangered) it's at most educated guesswork. – Uanfala (talk) 12:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, if Grierson and Bailey are the two main sources then they need to actually be referenced in the article. RuudVanClerk (talk) 12:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]