Talk:Raking fire

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force

My finger trouble on revert of 22 September 2010[edit]

I failed to give a reason when reverting this change. The "she" in the original copy refers to the ship, I believe, not the Admiral. Therefore it should remain "she" and not be changed to "he". Quartic (talk) 10:53, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Raking fire becomes less useful as a tactic[edit]

I've only just had time to glance at this JSTOR article, but it mentions that raking fire was less useful because the ship firing would receive more damage than she gives if the ship that was hit charged ahead. Having not read the article to get the context yet, I assume this is near the beginning of iron hulls and that the fire must have been directed towards the bow. Ryan Vesey 18:47, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]