Talk:Rajmahal hills

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rajmahal hills article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: Jharkhand / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Jharkhand (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

WP:INDIA Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition[edit]

{{WP India}} with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 10:47, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Rajmahal Hills[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Articles were merged as proposed. Operator873^CONNECT 02:30, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Page Bongan^® →TalkToMe← 22:15, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support as they are the same place, unless I'm missing something... —PC-XT+ 15:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.