Talk:Pull-up (exercise)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Passed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:26, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 13:52, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)}

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Links[edit]

Prose[edit]

Lede[edit]

supinated grip - this might need explaining. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh I see. A pull-up may be performed with overhand (pronated), underhand (supinated), neutral, or rotating hand position. The term chin-up is sometimes used to refer to the pull-up performed with supinated grip. - it's a bit odd to say that a pull-up can be done underarm, and then later say that it's called a chin-up. Should be merged. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done (t · c) buidhe 19:23, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

General[edit]

Is "kinematics" the best name - not movement or technique or something? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Renamed (t · c) buidhe 09:15, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I feel like the opening of the body should explain a bit more about what the pull-up is. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done (t · c) buidhe 08:54, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is a traditional belief that women are unable to complete a pull-up - this seems like such a ridiculously contentious statement it needs a ref. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's already supported by the cited source (p. 53): "It is unclear if other differences between men and women can account for the traditional belief in the inability of women to perform a pull-up." (t · c) buidhe 19:05, 31 October 2022 (UTC) NVM I just removed this sentence[reply]
As the "Guiness world records" is a brand name, can we not forgo the Guiness? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If there are other world records worth mentioning that are recognized by a different organization, then I would support the change but right now it only covers Guinness world records. (t · c) buidhe 19:03, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The table should have the names of the move in a separate column, preferably setup as rowscopes. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll move it to a separate column but I don't know how to do rowscopes. (t · c) buidhe 19:16, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Review meta comments[edit]

I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:52, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Lee Vilenski thanks for your review. I believe I've addressed all the points raised. (t · c) buidhe 09:15, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.