Talk:PubWatch
A fact from PubWatch appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 July 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article name[edit]
Should it be "Pubwatch" (lower case 'w')? That's how it's shown on its own website.--81.96.190.135 (talk) 16:29, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
I agree that it would be better to be Pubwatch rather than PubWatch. I will make the revisions. Steved1973 (talk) 17:07, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
I agree that "Pubwatch" would be more appropriate. HenryHayes (talk) 23:15, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Contested deletion[edit]
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... The website in question copy and pasted the text straight from the Wiki article. I know this because I wrote the initial wiki article for pubwatch! --Steved1973 (talk) 09:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC) The offending web site that has copy and pasted text directly from wikipedia is http://www.havantdistrict.co.uk/?p=902 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steved1973 (talk • contribs) 09:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class United Kingdom articles
- Unknown-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- C-Class Law enforcement articles
- Unknown-importance Law enforcement articles
- WikiProject Law Enforcement articles
- Articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/28 June 2010
- Accepted AfC submissions