Talk:Psilocybe weilii

Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles

Fungi Mid‑importance

	Fungi portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Identification Idications

Cap: Gold-Brown while young to Milky-white when mature. Wavy Edges. Sporeprint: Chocolate to Purple-Brown Habitat: Northern Georgia. Red Clay Soil. Often in clusters below Loblolly Pine (Pinus Taeda) Season: Fall after it begins to cool.

Im not sure why changes are being made, but i dont like them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Warriorsoul (talk • contribs) 01:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merger with Psilocybe caerulescens var. caerulescens[edit]

Psilocybe caerulescens var. caerulescens has recently been shown to be synonymous with Psilocybe weilii. I therefore propose that the two be merged to the Psilocybe caerulescens var. caerulescens page or to just Psilocybe caerulescens.

references:

Gul e (talk) 13:35, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is this proposed synonymy discussed anywhere in a reliable source? Sasata (talk) 14:33, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

the reliable source is the mycologist alan rockefeller (psilocybe expert) who is speaking first hand on the site mushroomobserver.org. How is an expert giving a first hand description not a reliable resource? This species should be merged with p. caerulescens.

We need a written account, preferably in a scientific journal; see WP:Reliable source. Sasata (talk) 17:27, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have been waiting on this until something gets published. They are definitely the same though. Phylogenetically, Psilocybe caerulescens is in the clade with Psilocybe mexicana, not in the Cordisporae as spore morphology would suggest. Alan Rockefeller (Talk - contribs) 02:50, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

technical jargon[edit]

Botany is good, but wikipedia is an encyclopedia anyone can edit as well as hopefully, anyone can read and understand. For me, the article reads like a botanical text, obscured by Latin & requiring much clicking to find definitions. In the interests of not sending the reader to another page so frequently (or switching off completely), can we have (even in brackets) some regular English language descriptors? I started but it's a pain. Manytexts (talk) 15:15, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]