Talk:Prevention (magazine)

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Advert[edit]

this article provides no real, unbiased information, it's basically and advert for Prevention..

Cover version[edit]

I uploaded a fair use image of the cover to give readers an idea of what the magazine looks like. The image that has replaced it is blurry and unnecessary since the magazine's format has not changed. I'm reverting to the previous image per these concerns. Gobonobo ^T ^C 04:29, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Citation Needed"[edit]

According to Wikipedia "List of magazines by circulation":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation#United_States

Prevention Magazine had a circulation of 2.9-million (2nd half of 2013).

This ranked 17th in the US (including 'magazines' bundled with Costco and AARP memberships) and was greater than that for all but six other magazines listed in that entry.

How's that for a "citation"?

Jsusky (talk) 22:40, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely poor article quality, basically a promotion[edit]

As others have stated this article is an embarrassment to Wikipedia. Look for instance at

Already controversial for his views promoting organic agriculture, Rodale was determined that the content of his health magazine would be based upon findings in scientific journals, a commitment that continues to this day.

Clearly written by the company itself, and is a completely unsubstantiated claim. Orangesherbet0 (talk) 09:01, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I find this article to be exactly what others are complaining of: a biased promotion. Anybody willing and able to give a balanced rewrite? Mikeatnip (talk) 22:25, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]