Talk:Pregnancy in art

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attribution[edit]

Text copied from Desco da parto to Pregnancy in art. See former article's history for a list of contributors. 7&6=thirteen () 12:48, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was me again. Johnbod (talk) 13:55, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beautiful article[edit]

I was wondering if those early 20th century American photographs of couples on the day of their wedding, showing a ghost child playing next to them on the carpet, would apply here? Yoninah (talk) 22:07, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I don't know any of those - wedding photos are a bit marginal as art frankly, & it sounds as if this is more Fertility in art anyway. Johnbod (talk) 01:29, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:06, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]