Talk:Population paradox

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was merge into Apportionment paradox. -- Tklalmighty (talk) 03:03, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stub Classification[edit]

This article is hardly political. If anything, it should be expanded to include a mathematical treatment of the topic. --Monguin61 19:47, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's practical implementation relates to politics, either with Congressional apportionment of House seats, or with proportional representation in legislatures. - Matthew238 08:01, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article might as well be merged with the "New States Paradox" and the "Population Paradox." They all are very subtly different examples of the "Apportionment Paradox," and very short articles individually. 71.86.194.196 (talk) 21:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will merge all three pages into "Apportionment Paradox." Tklalmighty (talk) 04:23, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.