This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles
My current edits correct this problem. Blog posts that reported the news and the press release issued via Google Docs are the only sources that have reported on this development. I realize this may post a problem for WP:SOURCE, but I'd argue that blogs should be allowed for citation purposes in circumstances where there is really no way to gain "expertise" on the topic that is being reported - especially when the topic involves developments about volunteer organizations and controversies that develop within them. Briancrisan (talk) 00:54, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]