Talk:Plastination

Other shows

I went to http://www.amazinghumanbody.com.au/ yesterday, quite cool. It uses the plastination technique, but does not seem to be related to the original inventor in any way.

Also, there's a slightly different process on display there, called tubular casts or some such, where a resin is injected into the veins/arteries of a limb or organ, then the surrounding flesh removed. Is this still plastination or is it some separate process?

cheers, Clinton.

Controversey

http://tvnewswatch.blogspot.com.es/2012/08/rumours-persist-following-gu-kailai.html 47.60.67.17 (talk) 10:12, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Computer simulation alternative

Proponents for the increased respect and courtesey for the human body point out that the inventors went ahead with the institute without due consideration to alretnative non intrusive methods of anatomy illustration such as digital computer rendered simulation. Computer simulation of the human body would alow much closer and detailed analysis of the human body. Zoom in, see through and body position maneuverability could allow a digitally simulated model much greater detail and content than a physical model ever could. Redistributing the simulations in the form of software over the internet, could further accomplish a broader viewer base and through a much more flexible means without ever requiring the use of bodies. Because of the versatility of software and the development of computer technology today, a virtual model is not only vastly supperior and more available to viewers world wide, but also an opportunity for further scientific development. The lack of a free, open source, world wide online available simulation while continuation of plastination, is not only unscientific, but also disrespectfull to the human body. -Written without signing by User:Nadyes

What controversy? This is apparently written by someone who knows hardly anything. At least for the coming 100years plastination won`t be replaceable by any other technique and even then only partially. Besides not everyone is a religious fundamentalist and believes that throwing a stone is disrespectful or likewise using dead carcasses with complete anonymity. Besides what you said gotta be the stupiest thing i heard in a year or so. CT is used because it can be performed in a live individual but it will never not even close exceed an actual cutting tomography. Theoretically not possible and there are worlds in between. Yes Plastination also enabled cutting tomography. I can savely claim that plastination will be used for the next several hundreds of years.Slicky 15:04, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Someone should consider seperating criticisms out of the main article (see step seven) ... and this is a kinda one sided argument article.69.158.59.78 14:36, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Allegations of Chinese Human Rights Violations involving Plastination

The article makes no mention of the history of allegations that the Chinese government has sold the bodies of political prisoners for use in plastination. This subject has received news coverage, is the subject of legislation, and deserves coverage here. 21:27, October 31, 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.203.88.125 (talk) 19:26, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

USGov patent link is dead

The link to "List of US patents by Gunther von Hagens" seems to be dead, but I would rather someone replace it than just remove it, as the subject seems fairly interesting.

Final paragraph

The last paragraph of the main section was poorly written, unencyclopedic, and completely POV. I removed the whole thing, as it contributed nothing to the article and made it read like a junior high school paper. DrExtreme 21:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Conflict of interest? Point of view?

I'm tagging this article with wp:coi and wp:pov. I'm looking up another brazillion things right now, so I'm not doing due diligence to the tag like I ought to. Anyway, what3ver/What3ver, anyway. I think this entry could use some looking at, for fixing. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 13:22, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

I'm rereading the article now, & I think the tags are over the top, so I'm removing them. I'm not sure what pickle was up where when I added them this morning. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 01:07, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Removal brain.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion: File:Removal brain.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status File:Plastination.JPG has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status File:Plastination2.JPG has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status File:Plastination3.JPG has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status File:Plastination4.JPG has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status File:Plastination5.JPG has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:20, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Hand plastination.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Hand plastination.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:54, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Plastination. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090515122825/http://meduni02.edis.at:80/plast/plmeth.html to http://meduni02.edis.at/plast/plmeth.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)