This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
A fact from Pauline Bart appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 November 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that according to American sociologist Pauline Bart, "everything is data, but data isn't everything"?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
What a fascinating topic. The first statement in the body was unexpected and extremely hooky, but I suspect too avant garde for DYK (sadly). All DYK requirements met, newnews, copyvio, length. GTG. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Career section kinda jumps around all over the place. Part of that, I understand, is due to the sources being across the time period as well. But it can and probably should be ordered chronologically where possible, rather than mentioning things like her Ph.D. work most of the way through the section after having already discussed multiple things she did 20 years later earlier in the section. Also, third level sub-sections could also be added and their titles could have year periods (such as (1952-1967)) alongside the subsection titles themselves. And the Published Works section should probably be split up into third level subsections for books and studies. And some more studies should be thrown in there. SilverserenC 17:11, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What a fascinating topic. The first statement in the body was unexpected and extremely hooky, but I suspect too avant garde for DYK (sadly). All DYK requirements met, newnews, copyvio, length. GTG. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)