Talk:Paranoid Park (film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA, and so far I think it is very good. It is well written and your sources seem to be reliable. It is an interesting article on an interesting film. —Mattisse (Talk) 02:19, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

• I have been through the article and think it is fine. I see nothing to criticize.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Clearly written b (MoS): Follows MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Unusually well referenced and references are well formatted b (citations to reliable sources): The sources are reliable c (OR): No OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Covers the major aspects of the film b (focused): Remains focused on the subject

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: Is NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• Congratulations! This is an excellent article, impressively referenced and cleanly edited. The article manages to say what is necessary while still being concise. Very good job.

—Mattisse (Talk) 21:15, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! —97198 (talk) 06:21, 1 May 2009 (UTC)