This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
I'm working off Wikipedia:Mos#Italics here; this quote is too long for quotation marks, and the MOS asks us not to use italics to indicate quotation. The only deviation is that I didn't blockquote the long quote, because it seemed pointless to me given that the whole section is a quote. On the other hand, I can see another point of view here, which is that it's not clear that it's a quote from the source. It's not a problem ethically or legally, because the source is PD and there's a template stating that material from the source is incorporated into the article, but it may well be misleading. I'm not sure how to make this clear to the reader, or whether it matters.— alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 18:08, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
