Talk:Paper cut bug
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paper cut bug article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Deletion[edit]
Why are you so impatient. It is deeply delibitating simple to have this sort of comment thrown in your face when so much of the Wikipedia is full of trivia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tarannon103 (talk • contribs)
- WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is a very poor argument to use. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 19:36, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- I have tagged this article for notability. Unless some reliable third party refs can be found I am not sure this article will be retained on Wikipedia. - Ahunt (talk) 21:31, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Paper cut bug. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PaperCut
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:02, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
