Talk:Overjustification effect/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: LauraHale (talk · contribs) 09:16, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
contribution history makes pretty clear the nominator is not coming back to the article, because they nominated it despite obvious lack of meeting WP:GAN criteria like FULLY sourced and WP:MEDRS. THIS clearly indicates on this medical article that this primary research. These issues are so systematic and the user not regularly editing that a quick fail is best. --LauraHale (talk) 09:16, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
To clarify, would it be better to leave out the primary sources entirely, or to try to find other sources that explicitly cite these primary sources? Thanks! TroyandAbedintheMorning (talk) 03:21, 1 May 2012 (UTC)