Talk:Outline of public relations/Archives/2012

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Untitled

This list has been configured in a heirachical order to imply the author is an authority who can accurately articulate the use of force involved in the various methods. The authors reasoning is flawed, and is not based on academic concensus or even a loose academic agreement. Ordered as a heirarchy, this page becomes a navigation tool for a tour of the democrat view of how republicans distort information, but in which the democrat perspective is masked behind scholarly appearing format. This is dishonest.

An alphabetized list is the neutral arrangement, unless the editor claiming to be an authority on why one alleged propaganda or public relations technique is more forceful than another can cite literature supporing his claim. Reality check 18:36, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)

To be honest, I agree: the alphabetized version is more neutral. I don't think that either liberals/democrats or republicans/conservatives have a monopoly on these methods. Washington irving 18:50, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)