Talk:Ordet

Denmark Mid‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Christian / Nordic / Core

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Christian films task force.
	This article is supported by the Nordic cinema task force.
	This article is on the project's core list.

Year of the play[edit]

The first paragraph says that the play by Munk was of 1932, but according to this very page and the biographical page on Kaj Munk the play is of 1925. I was going to change the date but I realized that the premiere was at 1932. What should be the date for a play? I believe 1925 is better, but....Dumu Eduba (talk) 18:15, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I went with 1932 for an edit, one supposes the play would have been revised before its first performance. It is more usual to go with the date of first publication, performance, release, etc. Philip Cross (talk) 18:29, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since this article is about a movie based on the written play, I would think the first publication date the play would be the most convenient (or perhaps state both dates). --Saddhiyama (talk) 20:00, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ordet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141102200355/http://www.bodilprisen.dk/1955 to http://www.bodilprisen.dk/1955

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:32, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]