Talk:Olaf's Frozen Adventure

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleOlaf's Frozen Adventure has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 23, 2021Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 13, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Olaf's Frozen Adventure was removed from exhibition in Mexico following complaints about its length?

date[edit]

Just like Coco this short film was released in Mexico on October 27, 2017.RubeHM (talk) 00:37, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 23, 2017[edit]

Hi! I just ran the tool for the page. The link it caught was a YouTube URL, which I misunderstood as WP:C-P violation, as it was totally copied from Wikipedia. Though still, I changed some prose.

However, the premise added here totally violates C-P, as it is shown in the tool. It could be re-worded here. Thanks! M. Billoo 18:22, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 September 2018[edit]

(duplicate of entire article removed)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:35, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Olaf's Frozen Adventure/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 13:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • "who praised for its" → "who praised it for its"
  • #Plot is 296 words so that passes WP:FILMPLOT.
  • "Olaf and Sven decides" → "Olaf and Sven decide"
  • Add a serial comma between "Christmas, Hanukkah and Winter solstice".
  • "a television special, to be aired on ABC, produced by Roy Conli, and directed by Kevin Deters and Stevie Wermers" – reword
  • "limited time theatrical release" → "limited theatrical release"
  • "the story follows Olaf as he tries to find the best holiday traditions for Anna, Elsa, and Kristoff" — is a summary needed?
  • [8][9][10][11] – make a WP:CITEBUNDLE.
  • Resolve the "[better source needed]" tag.
  • Add a hyphen between "limited time" in #Release.
  • Remove the links to Pixar and Coco in #Release (WP:OVERLINK).
  • "apologies, and removed the short from exhibition" → "apologies and removed the short from the exhibition"
  • "It was viewed 5.64 million times." → "It was viewed by an estimated 5.64 million people in the United States."
  • The Rotten Tomatoes score is wrong (actually 7 reviews, not 10; 5.1 average, not 5.12).
  • "betteroff" → "better off"
  • "contributions on the project" → "contributions to the project"
  • "incoperated" → "incorporated"
  • "as Tesco-exclusive" → "as a Tesco-exclusive"
  • "the United Kingdom December 7, 2017" → "the United Kingdom on December 7, 2017"
  • Metro has been found to be an unreliable source.
  • Update the British Board of Film Classification link.
  • Sources are archived.
  • #12 should be properly cited.
  • Mark references from The Telegraph with "|url-access=registration".
  • Is LaughingPlace reliable?
  • Those are my notes. Ping when done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 18:23, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Some Dude From North Carolina:,  Done. Wingwatchers (talk) 21:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Chipmunkdavis (talk) 15:18, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Wingwatchers (talk). Nominated by Pamzeis (talk) at 12:12, 24 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • Review by Tbhotch

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Recently approved GA; neutral and sourced; hook verified and interesting. I have no opinion about which hook should be posted as they are pretty much the same. I'll leave it to the main page balancers. QPQ done. Earwig's Copyvio Detector marks 3 potential links as copyvios but all are Wikimirrors. Good to go. (CC) Tbhotch 20:29, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To T:DYK/P3