Talk:Occhiali/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sexual life of Uluç Ali Reis the Italo-Turkish Latin Lover

I have searched the Italian marine archives (which are 1,000,000 times more detailed than Turkish marine archives) but couldn't find any information about the alleged hyperactive sex life of Uluç Ali Reis (which is cool by the way).

I personally am not surprised that Murat Bardakçı, the notorious "tabloid historian" of Hürriyet daily newspaper, came up with such a spicy story (like all his other history-related stories).

Murat Bardakçı is gay. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.101.193.29 (talk) 08:14, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
However, who cares about the sexual life/preferences/fantasies of a 16th century Ottoman admiral?
Should we add his penis size as well, if we manage to get information on that one?
Khoikhoi, believe me, even if you were famous, I wouldn't care about your sexual life.
I would rather care about your "achievements" as a sailor. 151.42.176.142 02:14, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
I wholeheartedly agree. This is simply unsubstantiated sensationalism, not stuff for WIKI. Cosal 03:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Posh and balderdash. WP:NOTCENSORED. — LlywelynII 07:12, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Statue of Kılıç Ali Paşa at La Castella.jpg

Image:Statue of Kılıç Ali Paşa at La Castella.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Name

If Uluj Ali is the COMMON ENGLISH name for Turkish Uluç Ali Reis, the article should be moved to Uluj Ali. If it isn't, it shouldn't be what the article is using. Either way, sth's gotta give. — LlywelynII 07:12, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved Alpha Quadrant talk 18:39, 23 September 2011 (UTC)


Uluç Ali Reis → Uluj Ali per WP:COMMONNAME & maybe WP:USEENGLISH

According to Books Ngram Viewer, Uluj Ali is overwhelming other.

-- Takabeg (talk) 12:12, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

  • Oppose The figures quoted above hardly establish that anything is used as a common English name. The instructions at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) state "it can happen that an otherwise notable topic has not yet received much attention in the English-speaking world, so that there are too few English sources to constitute an established usage. Very low Google counts can but need not be indicative of this. If this happens, follow the conventions of the language in which this entity is most often talked about (German for German politicians, Turkish for Turkish rivers, Portuguese for Brazilian towns etc.)." This article seems to fit that criterion exactly, which would mean retaining it at the Turkish name. Skinsmoke (talk) 03:51, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

@ Skinmoke: As long as I understand, you confuse google books research with google research. Takabeg (talk) 04:32, 13 September 2011 (UTC) @ Skinmoke: As long as I understand, you didn't check Books Ngram Viewer. Takabeg (talk) 04:51, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

  • Oppose per Skinsmoke. We should use Turkish name for that person. - Darwinek (talk) 20:37, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Occhiali. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Occhiali/Archive_1&oldid=1073886764"