Talk:OTR (convenience store)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal OTR (convenience store) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Relationship with On the Run[edit]

@Marcnut1996 Here's an article which might help clarify their relationship. Samuel Wiki (talk) 07:58, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Samuel Wiki: This article contradicts what the Indaily article said. I am tempted to believe the latter as the court case is a real one. Marcnut1996 (talk) 09:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Samuel Wiki: Here is the full case on AUSTLII: [1].

@Marcnut1996 Interesting. I guess it's possible they licensed the name later from ExxonMobil but it's not clear whether that's the case. It's not that important anyway so I'll just leave it. :) Samuel Wiki (talk) 10:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Samuel Wiki: Not too sure about that. Shahin had been opposed to Exxonmobil's application for the trademark between 1999 and 2005. As at 2011, ExxonMobil still owned trademark to On The Run (797721) in relation to fuel, clothing/footwear and drinks, but by 2020, Shahin owns the trademark. Still looking into how Shahin got the trademark. Once I find out how, then I think the puzzle is completed. Marcnut1996 (talk) 10:55, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Samuel Wiki: It also appears that trademark 797720 "Mobil On the Run" was not renewed in June 2019 and lapsed (see [2]). Both 797720 and 797721 were due for renewal on 18 June 2019. 797721 was renewed and now due for renewal on 18 June 2029, but I am not sure if it was by Shahin or ExxomMobil. Marcnut1996 (talk) 11:04, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]