This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
A news item involving OECD was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on the following dates:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International development, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of international development, including such areas as appropriate technology, microfinance and social issues, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International developmentWikipedia:WikiProject International developmentTemplate:WikiProject International developmentInternational development articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization articles
I just had a look into this article to better inform myself about OECD. I have been surprised to notice that, compare to numerous aticles I have read on Wikipedia about global institutions, there is none "Critics" section. I am not an expert in OECD or global governance institutions, but there is certainly number of critics adressed to this institutions as any others. I don't feel myself qualified to do so, but I think it would be a pertinent addition to this article if anyone has some knowledge about OECD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.182.116.245 (talk) 07:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. I find it amusing that NIEO have a 40% share of the text dedicated to a criticism seciton and this page doesn't have one at all.
Per WP:NOCRIT, in most cases separate sections devoted to criticism, controversies, or the like should be avoided in an article because these sections call undue attention to negative viewpoints. Articles should present the prevailing viewpoints from reliable sources fairly, proportionately, and without bias, whether positive or negative. Beagel (talk) 18:50, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest to add a list of the main statistical indicators that the OECD publishes, such as the PISA studies, STRI, or Product Market Regulation indicators. These are regularly used in peer-reviewed economic research and policymaking. I would argue that they are of similar notability as the Doing Business index and other statistical indicators that have separate articles, so some of them should probably also have a separate page. EditingEconomist (talk) 09:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've just removed the map from the infobox (shown at the top of this thread), as it's misleading. The key problem is that it defines the various countries as being either OECD members or OECD applicants. This isn't correct - as this article notes, there are actually several categories of non-members who are OECD partners, with only some of these countries having applied to join the organisation of which only a sub-set are going through the formal accession process. If a map showing non-members is included, it needs to reflect this diversity. The map was also flawed in that it included Malaysia as an applicant, where the reference to this in the article was very low quality (an old news story reporting that a low ranking Malaysian public servant had said that Malaysia was applying at a minor conference, with no follow up reporting I can see - OECD membership applications are actually announced by national leaders and attract lots of media attention). @StevoLaker: as the creator of this map. Nick-D (talk) 10:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
