Talk:Nuclear Power 2010 Program

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Permission to use quoted material[edit]

On August 8th, 2005 I obtained permission to use the quote "A production tax credit of 1.8 cents per kilowatt-hour for the first 6,000 megawatt-hours from new nuclear power plants for the first eight years of their operation, subject to a $125 million annual limit. The production tax credit places nuclear energy on equal footing with other sources of emission-free power, including wind and closed-loop biomass" from:
Steve Kerekes
Senior Director, Media Relations
Nuclear Energy Institute
Wash DC
202/739-8073
Simesa 20:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we really need permission for a short quote of two sentences... --Delirium 00:07, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think Simesa intended more to confirm the validity of the quote, since numbers are involved.--Xiaphias 08:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, I should've waited till January 2008 to post that. --Xiaphias 08:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Costs of new plants[edit]

From Nucleonics Week, July 2006, "Areva is now estimating US$ 1800-2000/kW capacity for US EPR, Westinghouse $1500-1800/kW for AP1000, and GE $1850/kW for ABWR and $1600/kW for ESBWR." Simesa 15:14, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spent Fuel from the Gen III+ Reactors[edit]

A Gen III+ reactor such as the Westinghouse Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor (AP1000) will used high eriched fuel (with ~5 % initial U-235) and be consumed to high burnup (> 35 Gwd/MTU).

Martin Seitz Physical Scientist ASE Corporation 955 L'Enfant Plaza Suite 5300 Washington DC 20024 202-406-3905

The Changes in 2008 and Beyond[edit]

If anything, the 2005 legislation came into effect in 2008 with the massive loan guarantees were officially backed by federal government, and then subsequently extended in Obama's 2011 budget. The real legislation, policy implementation (and effects), what utilities have done, or anything substantial since the 2nd nuclear age began (2004-2010+) is not being cited or shown anywhere on this page. I am considering revamping this page or using some of its information in a more succinct way to fulfill the promise of "nuclear power 2010 program", since there is no 1 unifying page for the current US nuclear policy since 2005, this page could be helped by integrating more already available info from other nuclear wiki pages, and by more personal findings that can be cited.

I am part of a Wiki Foundation program where graduate schools across the country are coming into Wiki and improving the known information in various fields. My feild is US Environmental Policy from the WCU MPA department. Myself and my partner have extensive information on current Nuclear policy from both an neutral academic standpoint, and a supportive (pro-nuclear) non-profit standpoint. Any thoughts or suggestions to my suggested revisions?

Be well, Kayz911 17:29, 3 February 2011‎ Kayz911

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nuclear Power 2010 Program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060224175907/http://uk.biz.yahoo.com:80/050915/323/fs67q.html to http://uk.biz.yahoo.com/050915/323/fs67q.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:58, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nuclear Power 2010 Program. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070710094024/http://www.nei.org/documents/Energy_Bill_2005.pdf to http://www.nei.org/documents/Energy_Bill_2005.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]