Talk:Nostradamus ni Kiite Miro

On Nostradamus ni Kiite Miro♪ being "patent nonsense"

I provided a link proving the existance of the developing game, so I don't see any reason why this should be contested. Navel, the original company Lime is from, has made famous visual novels in the past, including Shuffle! I believe the speedy delete was placed on grounds of its rather odd name alone. --SeizureDog 19:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

I'll also add that it has a page on the Japanese Wikipedia. As I understand it, any article worthy of existing on a foreign language Wikipedia is equally warrented here. --SeizureDog 19:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

WHY DOES THE ARTICLE HAVE A MUSICAL NOTE IN THE TITLE THEN? 24.16.19.181 20:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Because the Japanese just like to use musical notes and stars and such in their titles. The exact article title on the Japanese Wikipedia is "ノストラダムスに聞いてみろ♪" with the note. I'm merely keeping the title as official as possible, as we're not supposed to use unofficial translations. --SeizureDog 20:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

japs r crazy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.16.19.181 (talk • contribs)

Sure enough. Now, would you mind removing the speedy delete tag? That is, unless you still feel it needs to be deleted...--SeizureDog 22:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was moved per WP:NC. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 07:07, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

Nostradamus ni Kiite Miro♪ → Nostradamus ni Kiite Miro — Following the precedent of Lucky ☆ Star → Lucky Star (manga) (Talk:Lucky Star (manga)#Requested Move), a purely stylistic non-Latin symbol should be removed. Samuel Curtis^{Shinichian-Hirokian}-- _{TALK·CONTRIBS} 04:38, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Survey

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.

Survey - in support of the move

1. Support as nom. --Samuel Curtis^{Shinichian-Hirokian}-- _{TALK·CONTRIBS} 04:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Survey - in opposition to the move

Discussion

Add any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Now what kind of stupid poll was that? Closing on the same day it opens. I don't like the move, considering the issue hasn't been delt with at I ♥ Huckabees, which probably has the highest profile of any of these types of articles. Not that I really care either way where the article is, I just don't like that there's no true consensus on the matter.--SeizureDog 10:47, 18 January 2007 (UTC) I would also like to register my opposition. We can set up redirects for difficult characters; that's not a sufficient reason to rename these pages. This poll was handled very poorly. -Caudax 02:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC)