Talk:North Norfolk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Infobox[edit]

I restored the old version of the infobox as it was intended for districts instead of local authorities. However, {{Infobox Settlement}} is currently being rolled out on local government districts (see Birmingham for an example) and would be the best one to use here. It has a wide range of possible fields and the amount of data that can be presented is vast. MRSCTalk 11:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MRSC. I see you have removed the info box and replaced it with a very old template which seems to be gradually being phased out of Wikipedia. Rather than just replace newer version with the old one I suggest that you replace this old out-dated info box with the new one {{Infobox Settlement}} that you have mentioned.Stavros1 (talk) 14:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I suggest that {{Infobox Settlement}} should be put on this article. There is no point reinstating {{Infobox UK local authority}}. It is intended for councils, not districts. MRSCTalk 08:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As you have made the suggestion I presume you will do the work to change the Box Personally I think the Information in the Box you have suggested just duplicates what was already there in the first box you removedStavros1 (talk) 00:45, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Combine with other pages ?[edit]

HI

Just wondered if it might be an idea to combine this page with others to make a more comprehensive one

I have just tried to link to North Norfolk for the main Norfolk page to illustrate the natural beauty/holiday aspects, and had a choice of about 8

Perhaps combine with the North Norfolk coastal path etc and include something about Cromer, Waxham, Holkham to give a more complete picture of what an outstanding area this is. There are so many nature reserves and National Parks and hardly any of them are even mentioned (plus could mention the erosion factor lol)

just a thought ...

Chaosdruid (talk) 05:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]