Talk:Never Look Away

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 17 February 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved. The book article has been deleted, so this request is granted. Kudos to editors for your input, and Happy Publishing! (nac by page mover) Paine Ellsworth, ed.  put'r there  10:30, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


– The film was nominated for two Academy Awards. The book only has a few reviews and low pageviews. The book was reportedly picked up by NBC [1], but I can't find anything recent to come out of it. wumbolo ^^^ 10:13, 17 February 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. SITH (talk) 12:09, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:37, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose first, support second - I can support moving the novel as not being primary, but moving the film is WP:RECENTISM. I'd like to see a DAB constructed at primary, as there are other potential topics, such as award-winning songs. Once the recent hype settles down, we can re-evaluate and see how it stands. -- Netoholic @ 11:26, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral first, support second - I'm with Netoholic on this one - a disambiguation page should be created at the basename of "Never Look Away". No clear primary topic. Paintspot Infez (talk) 18:11, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support making the film primary topic. The book looks barely notable, and the film is probably what all readers are looking for. No reason to get in their way with a dab page. Nohomersryan (talk) 18:06, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. "Recentism" or not, of the two articles we have the film is clearly primary. PC78 (talk) 18:46, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Relisting note: relisting in order to gain consensus on first move and the question of primary topic. SITH (talk) 12:09, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Oscar-nominated film against fairly obscure novel. No recentism here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:13, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. The book article has been prodded and deleted, so it has been removed to fix the ensuing malformity of this RM. Paine Ellsworth, ed.  put'r there  10:26, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:52, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]