Talk:Nestlé Waters

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

France

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Water Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Water, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Water supply-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WaterWikipedia:WikiProject WaterTemplate:WikiProject WaterWater articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wonderwaves. Peer reviewers: Wonderwaves.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:32, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Biased?[edit]

Does this seem oddly biased and fake to anyone else? As in "nobody cares about your sales figures and history in such a corporate, methodical manner, and we paid someone to write this article for us". Start off first thing with sales figures, and end with "we do charity". I think the first line (and the template) is the only thing that should stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.68.144.73 (talk) 08:33, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seconed. Add flag for marketing? Frodeseverin (talk) 08:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Underrepresentation?[edit]

The main external link is to its own official website, while the only other Wikipedia link is for Nestlé Waters North America, Inc. Why aren't there more outside, neutral sources and references? This page also needs a link to the more-thorough Nestle page, which covers more under the subject of controversy and criticisms. For being the "largest bottle water brand in the world," I would hope this global company is fully researched and publicly accounted for. How can this page become more neutral and responsible towards the global water community? What kind of unbiased sources--other than the official website--can attribute towards lengthening this timeline and information board? Are there other companies that work for or against this company? How much did this company spend to buy out other water companies? Why does the wording seem to have a positive tone rather than a neutral, objective tone? Is this page biased or just underrepresented? Wonderwaves (talk) 04:46, 5 November 2016 (UTC)WonderwavesWonderwaves (talk) 04:46, 5 November 2016 (UTC) Wonderwaves (talk) 04:46, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]