Talk:National Rivers Authority

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi, I stucked a bit at the sentence of the second paragraph. Is all information alright, or maybe there is a typo? The assets and the staff of the RWAs were divided up at privatisation but all the assets relating to water supply reservoirs were transferred to the RWAs, even in cases where there were strong recreational and fisheries interests in the reservoirs. ... then Complex charging arrangements were also put in place whereby the newly created companies paid abstraction charges to the NRA for water removed from surface and ground waters but the NRA -> What are the newly created companies?? User:Maplefanta (talk) 22:05, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you're right, it must have been a typo - it made no sense as it was--C Hawke (talk) 17:31, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does the NRA still exist? The article uses the past-tense, but says nothing of it ceasing to function/how this came about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.113.225.1 (talk) 10:48, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No it went in 1996 - I have added a sentence to the article to clarify that.  Velella  Velella Talk   11:58, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where was its headquarters and how was it organised? Deipnosophista (talk) 08:42, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]