Talk:Nanjing War Crimes Tribunal

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japan: Military history Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 09:40, May 10, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Military history: Asian / Chinese / Japanese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	Japanese military history task force

Not clear[edit]

It is not clear whether Gunkichi Tanaka was executed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.150.234.8 (talk) 15:20, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that he was actually executed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.150.234.8 (talk) 09:31, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contradictory information[edit]

The article as it currently stands is rather confused. It says the tribunal was established in 1946 to try 4 individuals, all officers. A tribunal for 1 trial of 4 individuals is unlikely, but I don't have data on hand to check. The article then mentions some other people who mostly were not tried...but also Okamura (not in the list of 4 people to be tried) who it says was convicted of war crimes in 1948, then protected by Chiang Kai Shek. He thus seem to have been tried and convicted. The article claims that only one officer was prosecuted by the tribunal, Tani, convicted in 1947. What happened to the others is not clear, but it seems likely that they WERE prosecuted.

I suspect that the article was written by someone confused about the meaning of (1) prosecution, (2) conviction, and (3) the difference between the Nanjng massacre as a subject for criminal proceedings and the Nanjing War Crimes tribunal as an institution which tried certain cases, and then "cleaned up" by others who are not familiar with the history and didn't read the article critically. Philip R. Piccigallo's book would be a good starting source to clean this up. I have been hunting for my copy for weeks and can't find it, and pdfs are not available online at present. Dewobroto (talk) 07:28, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

13 tribunals[edit]

It was one of thirteen tribunals established by the Nationalist government.
China held 13 tribunals and executed 149 Japanese war criminals. This is of historical significance yet there is no Wikipedia article on the 12 other tribunals. Gentleman wiki (talk) 08:20, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, this is an important point. The Nanjing War Crimes Tribunal was only one of ten tribunals set up in ten different cities to try Japanese war criminals. There is no reason to single this one out as exclusively being deserving of its own article. Someone ought to consider ultimately folding this article into a broader article called, maybe, Trials of Japanese war criminals in Nationalist China. Tessa Bennet (talk) 04:31, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]