Talk:Moxon & Kobrin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More cases[edit]

  • Helena Kobrin threatened many people for posting the "6 lines" (with the plants and trees)
  • Helena Kobrin threatened many people who posted the Lerma decision, because it mentioned Xenu and the Body Thetans.

--Tilman 06:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New articles needed[edit]

Seems like Ava Paquette and Kendrick Moxon are certainly notable enough to have their own article pages on Wikipedia. Smeelgova 01:00, 16 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

If you think so, then go ahead. --Justanother 16:48, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not much is known about Ava. But much about Moxon (GO criminality, daughter electrocuted, and some memorable cases, e.g. Lerma, Jason Scott, Berry, etc. I'll put it on my watch list to correct / improve when time allows it. --Tilman 18:09, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have lots of sources for the Moxon stuff? I am not very familiar with these issues, so I might not be the best person to create the initial article and make a good case for notability. And probably would not be a good idea to create it as an initial stub - better to create it with lots of sourced citations and notability stuff. Smeelgova 10:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
A Kendrick Moxon article is a must. I lack the skills as a writer and research to create a competent article, however. Forgott3n (talk) 03:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For a start:

  • Moxon unindicted co-conspirator: [1]
  • Moxon's daughter electrocuted: [2]

--Tilman 11:08, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anything else? Television appearances? I think he appeared on 60 minutes trying to defend his use of the fair game policy. Etc. Smeelgova 05:03, 18 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
[3] [4] [5] --Tilman 06:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Most interesting. Smeelgova 06:42, 18 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

other Kobrin claim to fame[edit]

The alt.religion.scientology "rmgroup" (on Usenet)... AnonMoos (talk) 02:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

"...Guardian's Office (subsequently usurped by the Office of Special Affairs)..."

The use of "usurped" seems awfully loaded, rather than the NPOV ideal of Wikipedia. Do the Administrators think "...subsequently reorganized as the Office of..." does the situation justice? While the change may have had great import, particularly within the ARS community, it was still just an internal administrative action (albeit admittedly of a very controversial organization). Dick Kimball (talk) 15:45, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]