Talk:Mountie (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Mounties (disambiguation) was copied or moved into Mountie (disambiguation) with this edit on 4 June 2012. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Merger proposal[edit]

I propose that Mounties (disambiguation) be merged into Mountie (disambiguation). The plural version shouldn't be a separate article, it isn't for any other disambig page. TheTruthiness (talk) 09:49, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support merging, but I would merge into Mounties (disambiguation), as "Mounties" is the ambiguous title. "Mountie" and "The Mountie" are singletons. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:34, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What? Mounties & Mountie both redir to the same thing. Besides WP:PLURAL states In general only create page titles that are in the singular and this doesn't meet any of the exceptions. --TheTruthiness (talk) 00:27, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For whichever reasons/exceptions place the articles listed at Mounties (disambiguation) at their plural name, those would be the reasons/exceptions to place the disambiguation page for those topics for the ambiguous title (which happens to be plural) at the plural. -- JHunterJ (talk) 19:03, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As all the information from Mounties (disambiguation) had been copied here, (and was inappropriately tagged for speedy deletion), I have added the copied template (for attribution, and redirected Mountie DAB. Should any consensus come from this discussion to move it over to the other title, probably a history merge would be in order. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 23:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]