Talk:Molière radius

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I'd like to see this article list the Moliere radius for the electromagnetic calorimeters on ATLAS and CMS and other leading particle calorimeters. I know the CMS uses lead-tungsten crystals in its calorimeter. Pulu (talk) 00:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It would also be interesting to see the value for air etc. since it is interesting for all air shower detectors.14:29, 24 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.137.106.54 (talk)

Outdated approximation for Ec[edit]

Please read the current Review of Particle Physics (RPP) before inserting a formula from the one decade old Particle BriefBook. This 0.0265 (from the BriefBook) implying Ec ≈ 800 MeV/(Z + 1.2) is coming from the old Berger & Seltzer fit. The current Review of Particle Physics (section 27.4.3) states:

[...] Berger and Seltzer [46] also give the approximation Ec = (800 MeV)/(Z + 1.2). This formula has been widely quoted, and has been given in older editions of this Review [47]. Among alternate definitions is that of Rossi [2], [...] This form has been found to describe transverse electromagnetic shower development more accurately (see below). [...]
The accuracy of approximate forms for Ec has been limited by the failure to distinguish between gases and solid or liquids, where there is a substantial difference in ionization at the relevant energy because of the density effect. [...]

[47] is the ancient RPP from 1992, by the way. The proper relation is that RM = X0 Es/Ec, where Ec is a material constant, and for which a separate gas-liquid/solid fit should be used (given in the Review of Particle Physics), and not the one from Berger & Seltzer. — Ylai (talk) 02:22, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Molière radius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:10, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]