Talk:MirrorMask

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Copyvio in plot summary[edit]

I don't believe the IMDb actually lends out its material to Wikipedia. I've never seen this before anywhere else in Wikipedia. Right now it remains a copyvio and should be rewritten. Adding "courtesy IMDb" doesn't really mean anything. 23skidoo 14:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested permission to officialy use the aforementioned summary in this article. Until then, I have removed the summary.Klassykittychick 18:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Evil princess/Shadow self[edit]

The part about the evil princess mentions the idea of shadow self and attributes it to Freud. I believe the term shadow self is more of a Jungian idea, but derived from Freudian concepts. I am not a expert in such things but I think it should probably at least be changed to mention both Jung and Freud. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.88.112.114 (talk) 16:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The Plot[edit]

Shouldn't we start talking about the plot? I mean, that is a very important part of the movie! The Quidam 17:58, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reception section[edit]

There should be a separate Reception section, like all the other film wiki pages here, not just a "Release" section. Spiekier (talk) 06:06, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alice in Wonderland[edit]

This movie has really obvious similarities to Alice in Wonderland. Should they be mentioned? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lgrinberg (talk • contribs) 00:14, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Only if there are reliable sources to verify them, otherwise it'd be original research. --SilentAria ^talk 01:17, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on MirrorMask. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:01, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]