Talk:Miracle at St. Anna

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

To Errolbarnes: Naomi Campbell is in, look at the IMDB, Shia LeBoeuf, as far as i know, is out. -- LiquidCat

Shia's in according to this article in Variety [1] They've been wrong before though.. Errolbarnes 00:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i had a look around and looks like he's in so i've provisionally re-integrated him. I'm waiting for a call-sheet from a friend who's in production. -- Liquidcat —Preceding comment was added at 11:16, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cast list changes[edit]

I removed Luigi Lo Cascio and James Gandolfini. They have not been mentioned in recent articles about the movie and I can't find much in the way of reliable sources that put them in the film otherwise. It's irrelevant to Wikipedia guidelines that I have it on good authority from the stuio that they are not in the film, but it may help to explain my confidence in these edits. Meanwhile, the addition of Sciabordi can be sourced to THR.com[2]. NMS Bill (talk) 17:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Soldierofchicago (talk) 21:43, 14 July 2008 (UTC)soldierofchicago I saw the trailer to the movie. I've notice that Spike is using American half tracks painted earth gray as German halftracks. War movies are very expensive to make so it's a hard task maintaining accuracy. This should'nt be the only movie about Black soldiers in World War II. My father served with the 761st Tank Battalion in Northern Europe so he was in the thick of it as well.[reply]

External links[edit]

Removing external links that should be used as references not links. Also removing links that are already used as sources (Rotten Tomatoes), are not appropriate (a blog), not needed (see WP:EL). The ones that could potentially be used as sources are:

"Racism at home front" sub-plot[edit]

Skipped on in the Plot section. --94.246.150.68 (talk) 20:56, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Miracle at St. Anna/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 22:35, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be glad to take this review. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-3 days. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:35, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments[edit]

Overall this looks quite strong and ripe for promotion. It perhaps relies a bit heavily on the the film's press materials, but none of this information seems particularly controversial and overall it does a good job of covering the subject neutrally. I did a few prose tweaks as I went; please feel free to revert any you disagree with.

Here's some points I couldn't immediately resolve myself:

  • "which he believes to carry magical powers" -- is "he" Sam or the boy here?
  • "during the massacre at St. Anna" -- what massacre was this? I'm not sure I follow.
  • could a sentence about Renata's role in the plot be added to the plot summary?
  • "The first ten days of filming took place in the Serchio River" -- should this be on the river? Or did the whole sequence literally take place in the water? (I haven't seen this movie, in case it's not obvious from my comments so far).
  • " A scene that recreates the Sant'Anna di Stazzema massacre was shot on the actual location where the atrocity took place" -- I'm still not clear what role this massacre has in the movie's plot.
  • " Lucas generously allowed" -- It's a minor point, but "generously" seems both POV and unneeded here.
  • "the film currently has a 34% rating" -- "currently" should be rewritten as "As of" or some other formulation to avoid going out of date per WP:REALTIME
  • Could you add what the acronym ANPI stands for? -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:25, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


I have read your initial comments, and fixed as much as I could. -- User:FrankRizzo2006 (talk) 24:50, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I think that covers all of the above. I'll start the checklist now and see if there's anything left. -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:45, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist[edit]

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Spotchecks show no evidence of copyright issues.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. Poster image is tagged with rationale.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment. Pass

Ensemble Cast?[edit]

"an ensemble cast that includes Derek Luke, Michael Ealy, Laz Alonso, Omar Benson Miller, Pierfrancesco Favino and Valentina Cervi."


That would not be considered an ensemble cast. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.28.91.249 (talk) 01:17, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miracle at St. Anna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

checkY The help request has been answered. To reactivate, replace "helped" with your help request.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miracle at St. Anna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:48, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Miracle_at_St._Anna&oldid=1206192213"