Talk:Microassembler

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Terminology: microassembler vs. meta-assembler[edit]

I'm not sure I agree with the article's implication that "microassembler" and "meta-assembler" are synonymous. For instance, I don't think a microassembler which targets only a single hardware platform (e.g., Xerox Alto) can really be considered to be a meta-assembler. On the other hand, meta-assemblers such as AMDASM have no inherent knowledge of the target hardware, and force the user to supply a definition file. AMDASM and the like were primarily used for microcode, but could also be used for other purposes not involving microcode. --Brouhaha 07:24, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This was also my understanding, but to be sure I googled it: "meta-assembler A program that accepts the syntactic and semantic description of an assembly language, and generates an assembler for that language." [1] (among other similar descriptions). Therefore I deleted the phrase equating "microassembler" and "meta assembler." See "Meta Symbol" assembler for XDS systems.Peter Flass (talk) 13:30, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assemblers category[edit]

A microassembler does not serve the same purpose as an assembler. Someone interested in one does not care about the other. It should not be in the "Assemblers" category. Dgpop (talk) 13:15, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]